What we do
Board design and PCB engineering through manufacture, embedded platforms and firmware, FPGA design and acceleration work, VLSI and mixed-signal capability, and the system integration where hardware meets software. We also publish: our edge inference work on FPGA platforms and our silicon-level analysis pieces are public, because hardware claims should be checkable.
From schematic to something you can manufacture
Design work runs through the unglamorous gates that decide whether a board ships: schematic review, signal and power integrity, EMC consideration from the first layout rather than the third respin, design-for-manufacture checks against the actual fabricator’s capabilities, and bring-up plans written before the boards arrive. Prototype quantities and production handoff are part of the engagement, including the test fixtures and firmware provisioning that manufacturing actually needs.
Edge AI on real hardware, with published numbers
Inference at the edge is where our hardware and AI practices meet. We have deployed LLM inference on Kria-class FPGA platforms and published the throughput and latency numbers, and our silicon analysis writing has reached a wide engineering audience. When we size an edge AI design for you, the estimates come from measurement, not from a vendor’s slide.
Why hardware depth changes the software
Engineers who have debugged a board understand latency, failure and physical limits differently, and it shows in the layers above: telemetry pipelines designed for lossy links, cloud architectures that respect what the device can actually do, AI systems sized for the silicon they will run on. Provable systems start with understanding the physics you are standing on.
Questions we hear before engagements
Do you manufacture?
We design through production handoff and work with established fabrication and assembly partners, yours or ours. We manage the manufacturing relationship; we do not own factories.
Can you take over a half-finished hardware design?
Yes, it is the hardware version of rescue: design review, risk assessment in writing, then a path to production or a recommendation to restart, with reasons.
What about certifications like CE, FCC or automotive standards?
Compliance targets are design inputs from day one, and we work with accredited test labs for the formal campaigns. Retrofitting compliance is the expensive way.
What is the minimum engagement?
A design review is the smallest useful unit and often the right first step; full programs are scoped from there.
Related capability
If your system has to be right, let’s talk.
Start the conversation →